• Document Cloud
  • FOIL–Your Right to Know
  • See Through NY
  • Tax Exempt
  • Environmental Justice
  • Campaign Finance Reports

Preserve Ramapo

www.preserve-ramapo.com

  • Home
  • Join our email
  • Donate
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • The Archive
You are here: Home / Patrick Farm / Court tells Patrick Farm developer to start over

Court tells Patrick Farm developer to start over

November 11, 2017 by Michael Castelluccio

Aerial photo of Patrick Farm showing the proposed dense housing from developer's plans

Rosspilot aerial of Patrick Farm with superimposed housing from developer’s plans (tap for a larger view)

The plan would have put nearly 500 units on a property once designated for limited development. The court sent the town back to square one.

FROM NEW CITY PATCH – A series of legal decisions handed down Wednesday halt the massive Patrick Farm housing plan opposed by neighbors and many officials as over-development. The decision by a state appellate panel annulled both a Ramapo Town Board zoning change and Ramapo Planning Board approvals for a 470-unit housing complex near routes 202 and 306.

Patrick Farm is one of the last large open undeveloped parcels of land in Rockland County. Once designated in Ramapo’s Comprehensive Plan as ecologically sensitive and recommended for special limited development of up to 100 homes, in 2004 it was downzoned from 2- to 1-acre zoning. Then in 2010, it was rezoned to multi-family MF-8 development.

“I had never seen an application that downzoned property to this extent,” said County Executive Ed Day, one of the project’s foes since his days representing Pomona in the County Legislature. Pomona was a party to the suits. “The application shocks the senses, and the scope of this proposal poses an enormous and irreversible impact upon our community and our environment.”

According to the Appellate Court decisions, developers can only go forward with the project on the 200-acre former farm if they restart all environmental studies and requests for approvals and zone changes. The court annulled the Town of Ramapo’s zone change, amendment to the comprehensive plan, and subdivision approvals.

Day also praised neighbors and community groups that have been fighting the Patrick Farm development, including Suzanne Mitchell and Deborah Munitz, who formed the group Ramapo Organized for Sustainability and a Safe Aquifer, or ROSA.

Landscape Photo of the Pond on Patrick Farm

Patrick Farm pond

“It goes to show that one person or one organization can fight Town Hall and win,” he said.

ROSA members called the 10 connected decisions handed down Wednesday a “home run.”

As we hoped, the Appellate Court agreed that the Town’s original reviews were flawed and is now forcing the Town of Ramapo to revisit the environmental impacts for the zone change, essentially returning the property back to its original low density designation.” Munitz said in a statement.

The Rockland County Planning Department issued an 8-page review of the proposal in 2016 that contained 47 issues of concern.

“The nearly 200-acre site is environmentally sensitive because it contains an aquifer, wetlands, flood plains and steep slopes,” Day said. “This is exactly the kind of development that will irreparably harm our environment, including our precious water supply. It must be stopped.”

The county began foreclosure proceedings against the owners of Patrick Farm in 2016 after they fell three years behind on their tax bill. The next day, the developers paid $385,000 in back taxes.

The owners are now 10 months behind on their current bill and owe the County nearly $265,000 in taxes, records show. They also owe the East Ramapo School District $200,000 in unpaid taxes, Day said Thursday. He has instructed County Attorney Thomas Humbach to take whatever legal action is available to collect taxes owed on the property.

“I am pleased and relieved that the courts have finally agreed that this development cannot go forward,” said Day, who testified before the state Department of Environmental Conservation in 2013, asking them not to allow the project. “It’s a win for our environment, our communities and our way of life.”

ROSA offered these links to the decisions:

  • 2017-11-08 Appellate Bodin v Planning Bd 2014­07005
  • 2017-11-08 Bodin v Town of Ramapo 2012-08347
  • 2017-11-08 Matter of Bodin v Planning Bd 2012­11030
  • 2017-11-08 Shapiro v Planning Bd 2012-10588
  • 2017-11-08 Shapiro v Planning Bd 2014-07003
  • 2017-11-08 Shapiro v Town of Ramapo 2012-08384
  • 2017-11-08 Shapiro v Town of Ramapo 2013-06059
  • 2017-11-08 Village of Pomona v Planning Bd 2012-10582
  • 2017-11-08 Village of Pomona v Town of Ramapo 2013-06058
  • 2017-11-08 Youngewirth v Town of Ramapo Town Bd 2013-06057

SEE ALSO: The Patrick Farm Proposal – The Issue Is Overdevelopment

By Lanning Taliaferro, Patch Staff | Nov 10, 2017 9:19 am ET

Visit the New City Patch news service here.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Patrick Farm

Preserve Ramapo tree no border

Preserve Ramapo online since 2003

Recent Posts

  • What’s Ahead for Northeast Ramapo? Town Board Unanimously Approves Moving Forward to Change Code
  • VOTE! Special Election–East Ramapo School Board
  • East Ramapo wants to cut NAACP legal fees to $1, if not teachers could be fired
  • Appeals court backs NAACP in East Ramapo voting rights challenge
  • Airmont, Central UTA settle lawsuit, dropping discrimination claims as school can expand

Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015

Calendar listing for Posts

January 2021
M T W T F S S
« Dec    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Facebook

Other Links

Airmont,

Pomona,

Montebello,

Suffern,

Sloatsburg,

Hillburn,

Spring Valley,

Chestnut Ridge,

New Hempstead,

Wesley Hills,

Town of Ramapo,

Town of Clarkstown,

Rosa4Rockland,

Rockland Water Coalition

East Ramapo Central School District

Power of Ten -- East Ramapo for the Children,

Strong East Ramapo,

East Ramapo Videos,

Copyright © 2021 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in